A Fox News shop at Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport

How Liberals Learned to Love Fox News

December 1, 2016
3 mins read

The interview was originally published in NOVasia Issue 31 and is republished on The Policy Wire with express permission. For more exciting pieces on international relations from the brightest minds in Korea be sure to checkout their website

Fox News was born from a desire to counteract a perceived bias in the US media landscape. Its recently deposed chairman, Roger Ailes, set out to create a cable news network for an “underserved audience that is hungry for fair and balanced news.” Conservatives since the Nixon-era have consistently argued that major news outlets, both on television and in print, hire more liberal-leaning reporters and that their own political views filter into the reporting they do.

Whether true or not, Fox News has been successful in making this idea mainstream. In doing so, the network and the other media outlets, like and conservative radio talk shows that form what is referred to as a conservative “echo-chamber,” changed the way news is consumed and made in the US. While overtly liberal publications like Mother Jones and The Nation existed well before Fox, the initial reaction of mainstream media was to attack the cable network for bias and insist on objective coverage. In its wake, liberal media outlets, forming a liberal “echo-chamber,” have set out to emulate Fox News’ success through overtly partisan programming that similarly merges hard reporting and opinion.

Major news outlets have criticized Fox News since the mid-1990s, not for its conservative bias in hard news coverage, but for its over reliance on editorializing and opinion-based programming. The charge was that it further blurred the line between reporting and opinion. Newspapers like the New York Times were careful not to overstep in their coverage of the network and even corrected their own headlines that had “attribut[ed] a general political viewpoint to the network.” Meaning that, even though Fox News is full of conservative pundits and run by the openly conservative Roger Ailes, it was considered a step too far to say that the entire network was partisan.

The earliest and most respected Fox News detractors were more concerned with journalistic integrity than whether it leaned right or left. A common refrain was that it should be more objective in its coverage. Organizations that saw themselves as serious, and nominally impartial, journalism outlets decried the apparent bias of the network. Fox News became synonymous with modern muckraking, partisan, jingoistic journalism; something to be eschewed, fact-checked or even ignored with the hope that it might disappear.

Yet, traditional media and the political left could not ignore the network’s success. Shortly after September 11th, Fox News surpassed CNN to become the most watched cable-network in the US. Primetime cable news programs’ ratings were, and still are, dwarfed by the nightly news programs of the Big Three networks (NBC, CBS and ABC), but these behemoths, even today, enjoy certain inherent advantages that cable news does not have. Not only are these networks free, as opposed to pay-cable channels, they also enjoy the benefit of following local news programming each night which naturally increases their ratings.

Rather than sticking to the original goals of taking the high ground and reinforcing objective reporting and balanced opinion shows, cable networks like CNN and MSNBC have followed Fox’s methods in different ways. CNN began to focus more on celebrity news and opinion came to hold as much primacy as hard news coverage. MSNBC has gone even further in combining Fox News’ winning formula of using hard news as a window dressing to the primary purpose of the network. Like Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly of Fox News, MSNBC’s primetime presenters, Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow, revel in partisan attacks while also functioning as anchors when breaking political and non-political news occurs. The line between opinion and reporting is increasingly hard to find, perhaps not there at all. Everything from breaking news stories to the day-to-day of Washington is analyzed through partisan goggles.

Today, the US media landscape is awash with political news programming designed to catch their niche “echo-chamber” audiences, either on T.V. or the Internet. To the right of Fox, news consumers obsessed with conspiracy theories can watch Infowars every night. To the left of MSNBC, YouTubers can follow The Young Turks. Perhaps Roger Ailes’ Fox News was simply riding a wave that was already on its way in. Democracy Now!, a decidedly liberal offering, began airing the same year as Fox. Still, Fox News’ success and its detractors’ eventual capitulation to its style, if not formula, represent a dramatic change in the way information is presented to and processed by the public. This change has become an important quickening agent in the politicization of news and polarization of US politics, one that has sadly fueled one of the ugliest US presidential elections in modern history.

Gordon Gatlin is a current graduate student at Yonsei University working towards a Master Degree in International Trade. His research interests center on trade agreements and their impact on other aspects of international cooperation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Donald Kirk – Kim Dae-Jung and Sunshine

Latest from Uncategorized

Donald Kirk – Kim Dae-Jung and Sunshine

In 2000, then President Kim Dae-Jung became the first Korean to receive a Nobel Prize, for his life’s work dedicated to democracy and, to quote the Nobel Committee: “peace and reconciliation with North Korea in particular.” The award was granted shortly after the first North-South Korean summit in June of the same year, and in recognition of the merits of the Sunshine Policy in general. Yet fifteen years later, Kim Dae-Jung’s legacy remains controversial: not only is the success of the policy debatable, but some have also criticized the costs he was willing to pay in the name of reconciliation.
syrian refugees budapest

Europe’s Migrant Crisis – of the 5th Century

Rome was not built in a day, the saying goes. Yet the idea of a rapid “fall of Rome” seems to be commonly accepted: non-Roman barbarian “others,” taking advantage of Roman weakness, pouring across the borders and tearing down civilization, leaving Europe in a cultural backwater for the next millennium. This is an image which easily captures the imagination, and it fits into the general narrative of the Middle Ages as a generally backward, barbaric era. It has unrelentingly maintained its grip on minds, child and adult alike, even over the protests of professional historians who frown upon the use

The Will of the State: North Korean Forced Labour

The 2014 report of the United Nations Commission of Inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) laid bare an appalling scale of suffering across North Korean society. Violations of the freedoms of thought and life, discrimination on the basis of gender and disability, and arbitrary detention, torture, and executions defined the lives of a population. A report of the European Alliance for Human Rights in North Korea (EAHRNK) that we published in September 2015, ‘The Will of the State: North Korean Forced Labour’, places forced labour alongside these crimes against humanity.
Bedouin Israel Child

Israel’s Other Human Rights Catastrophe: The Negev Bedouin

The plight of the Negev Bedouin continued as Israel’s Supreme Court recently ruled that the village of Umm al-Hiran would be destroyed and its inhabitants removed to make way for Israeli settlers. The NGO Human Rights Watch criticized the ruling, which also applied to a similar village in the West Bank, with its Middle East and Africa director Sarah Leah Whitson stating “The court decisions in the Umm al-Hiran and Susya cases ignore international law in upholding discriminatory evictions by the Israeli authorities in Israel and the occupied territories”.
manchester united china fans

Bringing Football to Asia

Chinese president Xi Jinping has set his country’s national football team three targets to aim for: qualify for the FIFA World Cup, host it, and win it. Football has even been made compulsory in national schools, and projects for the construction of sports grounds have been passed swiftly to ensure the country can achieve its hat trick. As amusing as it may sound, Xi is by no means in the minority when he expresses his obsession and hopes for the sport. The hype over football has reached new heights, especially since the commercial success of January’s Asian Cup, a strong